

Arkansas is the only state without a state department of Agriculture and the only state in our region without a state program to
facilitate value-added diversification.
If you are interested in the effort to create public agency to help farmers, you can follow the latest developments with the bills at:
the Arkansas legislature's great website.
The bills during the last session were SB45 (the Governor's bill)
and Rep. Nichols' bill (HB 1013).
You can also find your Senator or Representative to talk to them about the need for more Arkansas value-added ventures through the map or alphabetical lists at the Legislature's website.
Many other states have been extremely successful at stimulating such ventures. AFCA was asked to give expert testimony to members of the Joint House/Senate Ag Committee heard of the many successes of other states.
Some details are given here.
Right now, Arkansas is not providing any of the marketing services other states provide.
Look at our survey of the most basic service, state labels, to see how other states are helping farmers.
Summary of Arkansas ag programs compared to other states.
Contact us for more details.
Replacing the "stay inside the the box" assumption is easy in this puzzle. The task of the group facilitator is help the group replace limiting assumptions which are much more difficult to abandon. If you can learn how to do it, solutions arise to all sorts of sticky problems throughout business and policy. Emery Roe shows how in his book Narrative Policy Analysis. Whenever you're in a situation where science shows no clear answer and people are polarized about which way to go, assume any solution is blocked by restricting assumptions. Look for a more basic stabilizing assumption which permits innovation. We've used the method to resolve entrenched farmer-environmentalist disputes (one result was a ground-breaking water quality authority where both farmers and environmentalists work together to improve water quality.
A common limiting assumption for farmers is that they should produce commmodities. Alternate assumptions which permit innovation are: Produce products, not commodities. Let's see the buyers what they want.
A couple of excellent sources on stimulating your ability to integrate, synthesize and just be more creative are:
von Oech suggests "a whack on the side of the head" to shake us out of routine patterns. "Whacks" provide a way to look at a problem or an idea differently, and von Oech offers a range of exercises, such as
Six Hats by de Bono takes the latter approach farther by proposing six metaphorical hats. In a group, we can put on or take off one of these hats to indicate the type of thinking being used. You've probably experienced this when a facilitator moved a group from brainstorming to evaluation. But brainstorming and evaluation are just two of six possible thinking styles.
White Hat thinking covers facts, figures, information needs and gaps. "I think we need some white hat thinking at this point..." means Let's drop the arguments and proposals, and look at the data base."
Red Hat thinking covers intuition, feelings and emotions.
The red hat allows the thinker to put forward an intuition without any need to
justify it.
The Black Hat is the hat of judgment and caution. The black hat is used to point out why a suggestion does not fit the facts, the available experience, the system in use, or the policy that is being followed. The black hat must always be logical. It is a crucial hat to employ at the right time, but often over-used in Western culture.
The Yellow Hat is for optimism and the logical positive view of things. It looks for feasibility and how something can be done. It looks for benefits, but they must be logically based.
The Green Hat is the hat of creativity, alternatives, proposals, what is interesting, provocations and changes.
The Blue Hat is the overview or process control hat. It looks not at the subject itself but at the 'thinking' about the subject. "Putting on my blue hat, I feel we should do some more green hat thinking at this point." In technical terms, the blue hat is concerned with meta-cognition.
If you want to get further into types of thinking and learning, you'll want to look at:
learning systems and systems learning
thinking skills and emotional intelligence.
Becoming adept at evoking integration and innovation is just one aspect of learning to transform systems. Look into the other areas:
The quickest way to develop skills in integrating and synthesizing is to find someone who is successful in helping groups create new systems and learn from them. Let us help you find a mentor.
